Josiah Swinney, Criminal Defense Lawyer in Winamac, Pulaski County, Indiana

Pulaski County Criminal Defense Awards for Expungement and Litigation

Criminal Defense Attorney in Winamac for Expungement and Suppression

Josiah Swinney is a distinguished criminal attorney in Indiana. Call Josiah directly at 317-753-7134 for a free consultation about any criminal matter in Pulaski County or elsewhere in Indiana.
When facing criminal charges in Winamac, you need a defense attorney who is experienced and fearless in the courtroom. Unlike many attorneys who push for plea agreements, Josiah is dedicated to fighting for his clients’ rights through rigorous litigation.
With a profound understanding of jury trials, court trials, suppression hearings, and Constitutional rights, Josiah meticulously prepares every detail to ensure the best possible defense. His ability to connect with jurors in Pulaski County and present compelling arguments makes him a formidable litigator. If you are looking for an Indiana criminal lawyer to fight for your liberty, call Josiah.
One of Josiah’s key strengths is his expertise in suppression hearings, challenging unlawfully obtained evidence. By scrutinizing the prosecution’s case, he ensures clients’ constitutional rights are protected, often leading to evidence exclusion or case dismissal. His deep knowledge of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, as well as Article 1 Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution, underpins his robust defense strategies.
When you choose Josiah as your criminal defense lawyer in Winamac, you select an advocate who stands by you every step of the way, prioritizing litigation over settling for plea agreements when it serves your best interest. Trust Josiah Swinney to provide the vigorous defense you deserve in Pulaski County.
Click any of the following links for more information:

Pulaski County Criminal Courts in Winamac

Criminal Defense Attorney in Winamac, Pulaski County

Suppression Lawyer and the 4th Amendment in Indiana

Suppression Law and Article 1 Section 11 in Indiana

5th Amendment and the Right to Remain Silent

Jury Trial Criminal Attorney in Indiana

Court Trial Criminal Lawyer in Indiana

Drug and Firearm Defense Attorney

Murder and Homicide Defense Lawyer

Sex Crime Defense Lawyer in Indiana

Domestic Violence Defense Attorney in Indiana

Federal Criminal Defense Lawyer in Indiana

White Collar Criminal Defense Lawyer in Indiana

Forfeiture Litigation Attorney in Indiana

Parental Discipline and Corporal Punishment Laws in Indiana

Contact Josiah Swinney for a Free Consultation

Winamac, Pulaski County, Indiana Criminal Courts

The criminal court system in Winamac, Pulaski County, Indiana, handles cases ranging from minor infractions to serious felonies. The Pulaski County Justice Center at 110 East Meridian Street, Winamac, IN 46996, houses the Circuit and Superior Courts. The historic Pulaski County Courthouse at 112 East Main Street is under rehabilitation, with some functions, including the Clerk’s Office, temporarily at the Anstis building, 117 East Main Street.
The Circuit Court, led by Judge Mary Welker (Room 225, Justice Center), handles felonies, misdemeanors, and juvenile cases, operating Monday–Friday, 8:00 a.m.–4:00 p.m., with a noon–1:00 p.m. closure. Contact: 574-946-3851. The Juvenile Detention Alternative Initiative (since 2016) emphasizes community-based alternatives like counseling. The Superior Court, under Judge Crystal A. Brucker Kocher, manages similar cases and hosts specialized programs like the Veterans Treatment Court (2018) and Drug Treatment Court (2025). Contact: 574-946-3371.
Felonies like murder or drug trafficking are primarily Circuit Court cases, while misdemeanors like DUI or minor theft are handled in Superior Court. Juvenile delinquency and protective orders are also processed, supported by the Community Navigator program for mental health and substance abuse resources. The Pulaski County Jail at 110 East Meridian Street (contact: 574-946-6655) has a 120-inmate capacity. The Probation Department, led by Christine Allen, oversees alternatives like home detention. Contact: 574-946-9510. The Prosecutor’s Office in Winamac supports victims and prosecutions. Contact: 574-946-3338.
The process begins with arrest and booking at the jail, followed by an initial hearing to set bail and pleas. Trials may be jury or bench, with jurors selected from Winamac and surrounding areas like Francesville. Sentencing may involve fines, probation, or incarceration. Fines are payable at the Clerk’s Office (contact: 574-946-3313) or online. Pulaski County’s system balances accountability with rehabilitation, serving its 12,514 residents effectively.

Indiana Criminal Suppression Lawyer and the 4th Amendment of the US Constitution

The Fourth Amendment states:

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

The Fourth Amendment focuses on the reasonable expectation of privacy and a balancing test.

  • Reasonable Expectation of Privacy: Established in Katz v. United States (1967), it protects people, not places, ensuring government respect for privacy.
  • Balancing Test: Courts weigh government interests against individual privacy rights to determine reasonableness.

Warrants and Probable Cause

  • Warrant Requirement: Issued by a neutral magistrate, warrants require probable cause and specific descriptions of the search scope.
  • Probable Cause: A reasonable belief, based on facts, that a crime has been or will be committed.

Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement

  • Consent Searches: Voluntary consent eliminates the need for a warrant.
  • Plain View Doctrine: Lawfully present officers can seize visible evidence without a warrant.
  • Search Incident to Arrest: Officers can search an arrestee and nearby areas post-arrest.
  • Exigent Circumstances: Emergencies like imminent danger allow warrantless searches.
  • Automobile Exception: Vehicles can be searched without a warrant if probable cause exists.

Exclusionary Rule

  • Purpose: Deters police misconduct by excluding illegally obtained evidence.
  • Fruit of the Poisonous Tree: Evidence derived from illegal searches is also inadmissible.

Important Cases

  • Mapp v. Ohio (1961): Applied the exclusionary rule to state courts.
  • Terry v. Ohio (1968): Allowed “stop and frisk” based on reasonable suspicion.
  • United States v. Jones (2012): GPS tracking constitutes a Fourth Amendment search.

For questions about your case in Pulaski County, call Josiah Swinney at 317-753-7134.

Criminal Suppression Law and Article 1 Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution

Article 1 Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution provides protections against unreasonable searches and seizures, interpreted independently from the Fourth Amendment. Key points include:

  • Reasonableness Standard: Indiana courts assess reasonableness based on the totality of circumstances, emphasizing privacy expectations.
  • Privacy Expectations: Strong focus on individual privacy, weighing intrusion against search necessity.

Indiana’s case law may yield different outcomes than federal cases. Learn more about suppression law.

The 5th Amendment to the US Constitution and the Right to Remain Silent

The Fifth Amendment protects against self-incrimination, stating, “No person… shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.”
Miranda v. Arizona (1966) established the Miranda warning, requiring police to inform suspects of their right to remain silent during custodial interrogation. Clear invocation is necessary; vague statements are insufficient. Failure to provide the warning may exclude statements from evidence. Indiana’s Pirtle Rights offer additional protections. For questions about your rights in Winamac, contact Josiah at 317-753-7134.

Jury Trial Criminal Attorney in Indiana

Josiah Swinney excels in jury trials, leveraging strategic advocacy to secure favorable outcomes in Pulaski County. Unlike attorneys who avoid trials, Josiah thrives in litigation. For a trial-focused attorney, call Josiah at 317-753-7134.

Court Trial Criminal Lawyer in Indiana

When legal interpretation is at issue, a court trial may be preferable. Josiah can assess whether a jury or bench trial suits your case in Winamac. Contact him at 317-753-7134.

Criminal Attorney for Drug & Firearm Cases

Drug and firearm cases in Pulaski County hinge on possession and suppression issues. Josiah handles cases from simple possession to trafficking, challenging evidence under federal and Indiana constitutions. Learn more about federal drug charges.

1. Constructive Possession vs. Actual Possession

  • Actual Possession: Direct control over contraband, like a firearm in hand.
  • Constructive Possession: Power and intent to control contraband, assessed by factors like proximity and incriminating statements.

2. Suppression Issues

(a) The 4th Amendment addresses privacy and warrant requirements.

(b) Article 1 Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution emphasizes reasonableness.

(c) The 5th Amendment protects against self-incrimination.

Murder & Homicide Defense Attorney in Indiana

Murder or homicide charges in Pulaski County carry severe penalties. Josiah’s expertise in forensic evidence and defenses like self-defense ensures robust representation. Learn more about murder defense.

Sex Crimes Defense Lawyer in Indiana

Sex crime accusations in Winamac require skilled defense to avoid registry consequences. Josiah’s litigation expertise minimizes impact. Call 317-753-7134 for consultation.

Domestic Violence Defense Attorney in Indiana

False domestic violence allegations in Pulaski County can arise from custody disputes or retaliation. Josiah aggressively defends against such claims. Learn more about domestic violence defense.

Federal Criminal Defense Lawyer in Indiana

Federal cases in Pulaski County involve complex statutes and harsher penalties. Josiah navigates federal guidelines adeptly. Learn more about federal defense.

White Collar Criminal Defense Lawyer in Indiana

Josiah handles complex white collar cases like fraud and money laundering in Winamac, ensuring thorough defense. Call 317-753-7134.

Forfeiture Litigation Attorney in Indiana

Asset forfeiture in Pulaski County threatens financial stability. Josiah protects your assets with constitutional arguments. Learn more about forfeiture defense.

Indiana Laws on Parental Discipline, Spanking, and Corporal Punishment

In Indiana, parental discipline laws allow reasonable force for control or education, per Willis v. State (2008). Excessive force risks battery charges. For guidance in Pulaski County, consult Josiah Swinney. Learn more about parental discipline laws.

Call Indiana Criminal Attorney Josiah Swinney for a Free Consultation

For a dedicated litigator in Winamac for criminal defense, appeals, or forfeiture cases, call Josiah Swinney at 317-753-7134. Josiah practices across Indiana, including Pulaski County.

DISCLAIMER – The information contained on this website is provided for educational and informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice or as an offer to perform legal services on any subject matter. The content of this web site contains general information and may not reflect current legal developments or information. The information is not guaranteed to be correct, complete or current. We make no warranty, expressed or implied, about the accuracy or reliability of the information at this website or at any other website to which it is linked. Recipients of content from this site should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information included in the site without seeking appropriate legal advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an Indiana Criminal Defense attorney or attorney licensed in the recipient’s state. Nothing herein is intended to create an attorney-client relationship and shall not be construed as legal advice. This is not an offer to represent you, nor is it intended to create an attorney-client relationship.