Josiah Swinney is a distinguished criminal attorney in Indiana.
With exceptional litigation skills, Josiah provides dedicated defense for clients facing criminal charges in Seymour and throughout Jackson County. Call Josiah directly at 317-753-7134 for a free consultation about any criminal matter in the State of Indiana.
When facing criminal charges, you need a defense attorney who is experienced and fearless in the courtroom. Unlike many attorneys who push for plea agreements, Josiah is committed to fighting for his clients’ rights through rigorous litigation.
With a deep understanding of jury trials, court trials, suppression hearings, and Constitutional rights, Josiah has a proven track record of securing favorable outcomes for his clients in Indiana. Whether presenting a case before a jury or arguing before a Judge, Josiah meticulously prepares every detail to ensure the best possible defense. If you are looking for an Indiana criminal lawyer who is prepared to fight for your liberty in Seymour, call Josiah.
One of the aspects of Josiah’s practice is his expertise in suppression hearings. He is adept at challenging the admissibility of evidence that may have been obtained unlawfully. By scrutinizing every aspect of the prosecution’s case, Josiah ensures that his clients’ constitutional rights are protected, often leading to the exclusion of critical evidence and, in some cases, the dismissal of charges. A deep knowledge of constitutional law underpins Josiah’s approach to criminal defense. He is well-versed in the intricacies of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, as well as additional protections under Article 1 Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution. This expertise allows Josiah to craft robust defenses that challenge any violations of his clients’ constitutional rights.
When you choose Josiah as your Indiana criminal defense lawyer, you are choosing an advocate who will stand by you every step of the way. His dedication to litigating cases when it is in his client’s best interest, rather than merely settling for plea agreements, demonstrates his commitment to achieving the best possible outcome for his clients. Trust Josiah Swinney to provide the vigorous defense you deserve in Jackson County.
Josiah’s courtroom experience is extensive and varied, reflecting his deep understanding of the legal system and his ability to navigate its complexities. He has successfully defended clients in many jury trials, where his meticulous preparation and compelling arguments have often led to favorable verdicts. Josiah’s approach to each case is thorough and strategic, ensuring that every detail is examined and every possible defense is explored.
In suppression hearings, Josiah’s expertise shines as he challenges the admissibility of evidence, often securing critical victories for his clients. His ability to dissect police procedures and identify constitutional violations has resulted in the exclusion of key evidence, significantly impacting the outcomes of many cases.
And for cases that do proceed to sentencing, Josiah Swinney’s expertise shines. Josiah delivers masterful advocacy and leverages his deep understanding of Indiana’s criminal justice system. Josiah crafts compelling sentencing arguments that highlight mitigating factors, challenge aggravating circumstances, and help persuade Judges to exercise leniency. His strategic approach, honed through years of high-stakes litigation, ensures that every client receives vigorous representation at this critical stage.
Josiah’s courtroom demeanor is characterized by confidence and poise. He is known for his persuasive arguments and his ability to connect with juries, Judges, and opposing counsel. His cross-examinations are particularly noteworthy, as he skillfully exposes inconsistencies and weaknesses in the prosecution’s case.
Click any of the following links for more information:

Jackson County, Indiana Criminal Courts

Josiah Swinney, Criminal Attorney in Seymour, Jackson County, Indiana

Indiana Criminal Suppression Lawyer and the 4th Amendment

Criminal Suppression Law and Article 1 Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution

The 5th Amendment and the Right to Remain Silent

Jury Trial Criminal Attorney in Jackson County

Court Trial Criminal Lawyer in Jackson County

Criminal Attorney for Drug & Firearm Cases

Murder & Homicide Criminal Defense Lawyer

Sex Crime Defense Lawyer in Jackson County

Domestic Violence Defense Attorney in Jackson County

Federal Criminal Defense Lawyer in Jackson County

White Collar Criminal Defense Lawyer in Jackson County

Forfeiture Litigation Attorney in Jackson County

Jackson County Laws on Parental Discipline, Spanking, and Corporal Punishment

Call Josiah Swinney for a Free Consultation in Jackson County

Jackson County, Indiana Criminal Courts

The criminal court system in Jackson County, Indiana, serves Seymour, Brownstown, and surrounding areas, handling cases from minor infractions to serious felonies. Centered in Brownstown, the county seat, the Jackson County Courthouse at 111 South Main Street, Brownstown, IN 47220, houses the Circuit Court and Superior Court II. Superior Court I operates at 1420 Corporate Way, Seymour, IN 47274. These courts ensure justice with a focus on public safety and rehabilitation, serving a community near the Muscatatuck National Wildlife Refuge.
The Jackson County Circuit Court, presided over by Judge Bruce Markel III, handles felonies, juvenile delinquency, and civil cases. Contact the court at (812) 358-6133 or fax at (812) 358-6187. Located at 111 South Main Street, Brownstown, IN 47220, it operates Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. The court emphasizes rehabilitation for juvenile offenders through community programs like counseling.
Superior Court I, led by Judge Amy Marie Travis, processes misdemeanors, traffic infractions, and small claims at 1420 Corporate Way, Seymour, IN 47274. Contact at (812) 522-9677 or fax at (812) 523-6065. It ensures swift adjudication for less serious offenses, accessible to Seymour residents.
Superior Court II, under Judge Bruce MacTavish, focuses on family matters and protective orders related to criminal cases like domestic violence, located at 111 South Main Street, Brownstown, IN 47220. Contact for protective orders at (812) 358-6802, divorces at (812) 358-6803, or juvenile matters at (812) 358-6804.
The Jackson County Jail, managed by the Sheriff’s Office at 150 East State Road 250, Brownstown, IN 47220, houses pre-trial detainees and short-term offenders. Contact at (812) 358-2141. The Clerk’s Office at 109 South Sugar Street, Suite 130, Brownstown, manages records and fines, contactable at (812) 358-6116. The Jackson-Jennings Community Corrections at 325 Dupont Drive, Seymour, IN 47274, offers alternatives like home detention and substance abuse counseling to reduce recidivism.
Felonies like drug trafficking or theft are handled by the Circuit Court, while misdemeanors like DUI are processed by Superior Court I. Protective orders are filed through Superior Court II, and fines can be paid online via the Clerk’s Office. The Probation Office in Brownstown supports compliance with court conditions, aiding reintegration. Access case information via mycase.in.gov for transparency.

Indiana Criminal Suppression Lawyer and the 4th Amendment of the US Constitution

The Fourth Amendment states:

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

The Fourth Amendment focuses on the reasonable expectation of privacy and a balancing test.

• Reasonable Expectation of Privacy: This concept was established in the landmark case Katz v. United States (1967), which held that the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places. This means that if an individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy, the government must respect it.
• Balancing Test: Courts often use a balancing test to determine reasonableness, weighing the government’s interest in conducting the search against the individual’s right to privacy.

Warrants and Probable Cause

• Warrant Requirement: A warrant must be issued by a neutral magistrate and must be based on probable cause. The warrant must specify the place to be searched and the items to be seized to prevent general searches.
• Probable Cause: This is more than mere suspicion but less than the evidence required for conviction. It requires a reasonable belief, based on factual evidence, that a crime has been, is being, or will be committed.

Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement

• Consent Searches: If an individual voluntarily consents to a search, no warrant is needed. The consent must be given freely and not coerced.
• Plain View Doctrine: If law enforcement officers are lawfully present and see evidence of a crime in plain view, they can seize it without a warrant.
• Search Incident to Arrest: After a lawful arrest, officers can search the arrestee and the immediate area to ensure officer safety and prevent the destruction of evidence.
• Exigent Circumstances: In emergencies, such as imminent danger, hot pursuit of a suspect, or the risk of evidence being destroyed, officers can conduct searches without a warrant.
• Automobile Exception: Due to the mobile nature of vehicles, if officers have probable cause to believe a vehicle contains evidence of a crime, they can search it without a warrant.

Exclusionary Rule

• Purpose: The exclusionary rule is designed to deter police misconduct by excluding illegally obtained evidence from being used in court.
• Fruit of the Poisonous Tree: This doctrine extends the exclusionary rule to evidence indirectly obtained as a result of an illegal search or seizure. If the initial search is unlawful, any evidence derived from it is also inadmissible.

Important Cases

• Mapp v. Ohio (1961): This case applied the exclusionary rule to the states, ensuring that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment cannot be used in state courts.
• Terry v. Ohio (1968): Established the “stop and frisk” rule, allowing officers to stop and pat down individuals based on reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.
• United States v. Jones (2012): Held that attaching a GPS device to a vehicle and tracking its movements constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment.

If you have questions, call Criminal Attorney Josiah Swinney at 317-753-7134 to discuss your case in Jackson County today.

Criminal Suppression Law and Article 1 Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution

Article 1 Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution provides protections against unreasonable searches and seizures, similar to the Fourth Amendment. However, Indiana courts interpret this provision independently from the federal Fourth Amendment. The key points include:

• Reasonableness Standard: Indiana courts use a reasonableness standard that considers the totality of the circumstances. This means the Court looks at the specific facts of each case to determine if a search or seizure was reasonable. The Indiana reasonableness standard of a search or seizure is assessed based on the totality of the circumstances, with a strong focus on privacy expectations, while Federal reasonableness is often assessed through established legal standards and precedents, such as the need for a warrant or recognized exceptions.
• Privacy Expectations: Indiana places a strong emphasis on the individual’s expectation of privacy. The courts often weigh the degree of intrusion against the need for the search or seizure.

The Indiana Supreme Court has developed its own body of case law interpreting Article 1, Section 11. This can lead to different outcomes than a Federal case, even when the facts are identical. For a more detailed look at suppression law and the constitution, click here.

The 5th Amendment to the US Constitution and the Right to Remain Silent

The right to remain silent is a fundamental protection under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. This right is primarily designed to protect individuals from self-incrimination during legal proceedings.
The Fifth Amendment states, “No person… shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” This clause forms the basis of the right to remain silent, ensuring that individuals cannot be forced to provide testimonial evidence that could incriminate them.
The landmark Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona in 1966 significantly expanded the practical application of the right to remain silent. The Court held that individuals must be informed of their rights, including the right to remain silent, before any custodial interrogation. This led to the creation of the “Miranda warning.”
The right to remain silent applies primarily during custodial interrogations. This means that if an individual is in police custody and subject to questioning, they must be informed of their right to remain silent and their right to an attorney. If a person voluntarily speaks to law enforcement without being prompted, those statements can normally be used against them in court. To invoke the right to remain silent, an individual must clearly state their intention to do so. Simply remaining silent is not enough; the person must explicitly assert their Fifth Amendment rights. Police officers are required to provide the Miranda warning to ensure that suspects are aware of their rights. Failure to do so can result in the exclusion of any statements made by the suspect from being used as evidence in court. In Seymour, this right is critical for protecting individuals during interactions with the Jackson County Sheriff’s Office.
Josiah also has a mastery of additional rights that are afforded in Indiana, known as Pirtle Rights, that give individuals additional protections that extend beyond the Federal Constitution.
The right to remain silent is a cornerstone of the American legal system, providing essential protection against self-incrimination. Understanding and properly invoking this right is crucial for anyone involved in legal proceedings in Jackson County. If you have questions about your rights under the 5th Amendment, contact Josiah at 317-753-7134.

Jury Trial Criminal Attorney in Indiana

Josiah J. Swinney is a distinguished jury trial lawyer known for his exceptional skills and dedication to his client’s interests. Josiah has extensive experience in high-stakes jury trials across Jackson County, where his strategy and persuasive advocacy have consistently led to favorable outcomes. His deep understanding of criminal law makes him a formidable opponent in the courtroom.
Many attorneys avoid jury trials, but Josiah thrives in litigation, particularly in Seymour’s Jackson County Courthouse. If you are considering hiring a trial attorney for a case in Jackson County, call Josiah for a free consultation at 317-753-7134.

Court Trial Criminal Lawyer in Indiana

Not all cases are appropriate for jury trials. In Jackson County, when the interpretation of law is in dispute, a court trial before a judge like Bruce Markel III or Amy Marie Travis may be the best course of action. This decision depends on the case facts and the specific judge. If you have questions about whether your case would be best heard by a jury or the court, contact Josiah at 317-753-7134 for a free consultation.

Criminal Attorney for Drug & Firearm Cases

Defending against drug or firearm charges in Jackson County often involves two core questions:
(1) Can the State prove possession – either actual possession or constructive possession?
(2) Is there a suppression issue that might result in the exclusion of evidence under the Federal or Indiana Constitution?
Josiah has extensive experience handling drug and firearm cases, from simple possession to trafficking and illegal firearm possession charges in Seymour and Brownstown.

1. Constructive Possession vs. Actual Possession

• • Actual Possession: This occurs when the defendant has direct physical control over the drugs or firearms. For example, if the police find a firearm in your hand, you are in actual possession.
  • Constructive Possession: This occurs when the defendant has the power and intention to control the drugs or firearms, such as those found in a car or home in Seymour. Courts consider factors like proximity to the contraband and incriminating statements.

2. Suppression Issues in Jackson County

(a) The 4th Amendment of the US Constitution focuses on whether a reasonable expectation of privacy exists and whether a defendant has standing.

(b) Article 1 Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution provides safeguards that emphasize privacy expectations, often leading to different outcomes than federal cases.

(c) The 5th Amendment protects against self-incrimination, potentially excluding statements if rights are violated.

Click for additional information about Federal Drug Charges in Indiana.

Murder & Homicide Defense Attorney in Indiana

Facing a murder or homicide charge in Jackson County can involve severe penalties, including life sentences. Josiah Swinney engages in meticulous preparation and aggressive advocacy to protect clients’ rights in Seymour’s Circuit Court.
With extensive experience, Josiah has a deep understanding of forensic evidence and legal precedents, crafting defenses tailored to each case. For more on Indiana Murder and Homicide Defense, contact Josiah at 317-753-7134.

Sex Crimes Defense Lawyer in Indiana

Facing sex crime accusations in Jackson County requires a skilled defense. Josiah Swinney’s experience ensures a robust and compassionate defense, challenging prosecution evidence in Seymour’s courts.
A sex offender registry placement can severely impact your life. Josiah works to minimize or avoid registration requirements. For questions about sex offenses, call Josiah at 317-753-7134.

Domestic Violence Defense Attorney in Indiana

False domestic violence allegations in Jackson County can arise from custody disputes or retaliation. Josiah Swinney aggressively defends clients, aiming for not guilty verdicts or dismissals in Seymour’s Superior Court II.
For more on domestic violence defense, contact Josiah at 317-753-7134.

Federal Criminal Defense Lawyer in Indiana

Federal criminal defense in Jackson County is complex, with higher stakes and harsher penalties than state cases. Josiah Swinney navigates federal statutes and sentencing guidelines with expertise.
For more on Indiana Federal Criminal Defense, call Josiah at 317-753-7134.

White Collar Criminal Defense Lawyer in Indiana

Josiah Swinney handles white collar crimes like fraud and embezzlement in Jackson County, providing dedicated defense in complex litigation. Call Josiah at 317-753-7134 for a consultation.

Forfeiture Litigation Attorney in Indiana

Government forfeiture in Jackson County can threaten your assets. Josiah Swinney protects your property with constitutional arguments and strategic defense. Contact Josiah at 317-753-7134.

Jackson County Laws on Parental Discipline, Spanking, and Corporal Punishment

In Indiana, parental discipline laws balance a parent’s right to discipline with preventing abuse. The parental privilege defense allows reasonable force for control or education, per cases like Willis v. State (888 N.E.2d 177, 2008). Excessive discipline can lead to battery charges, especially if reported in Seymour schools. For more, see Is Spanking Legal in Indiana? Call Josiah at 317-753-7134.

Call Indiana Criminal Attorney Josiah Swinney for a Free Consultation

For a serious litigator dedicated to your criminal defense, appeal, or forfeiture case in Jackson County, call Josiah Swinney at 317-753-7134. Josiah practices throughout Indiana.

DISCLAIMER – The information contained on this website is provided for educational and informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice or as an offer to perform legal services on any subject matter. The content of this web site contains general information and may not reflect current legal developments or information. The information is not guaranteed to be correct, complete or current. We make no warranty, expressed or implied, about the accuracy or reliability of the information at this website or at any other website to which it is linked. Recipients of content from this site should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information included in the site without seeking appropriate legal advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an Indiana Criminal Defense attorney or attorney licensed in the recipient’s state. Nothing herein is intended to create an attorney-client relationship and shall not be construed as legal advice. This is not an offer to represent you, nor is it intended to create an attorney-client relationship.